The Demise of the Twin Towers on 9/11 & the Beam Weapon Theory
By: Veronica Chapman
The Beam Weapon Theory is
the proposed hypothesis to explain the 'demise' of WTC1 & WTC2 on 9/11.
It is the only theory that has
been put forward which attempts to explain all the verifiable forensic evidence, including:
1)
Demise of the Towers at speeds mathematically
calculated to approach - very closely - the time for Free-Fall in a vacuum (9 -
10 seconds, approximately), even though the Towers stood in air of course, and
therefore should have taken 12 – 13 seconds at the barest minimum,
2)
Large 'bites' taken out of surrounding buildings (some almost completely
circular),
3)
Holes 'bitten' into the streets,
4)
'Toasted' cars,
5)
Pulverisation to fine (toxic) dust of the concrete, steel, asbestos, filing
cabinets, computer desk & equipment, and much of the organic material (i.e.
people) - of (what is probably) roughly 75% of each Tower,
6)
BUT - following on from (5), above - PAPER is left undamaged, so as to flutter
all over Manhattan.
7)
Retained protection of the WTC Complex Bathtub.
The theory starts from
observations & data based the 7th aspect, above.
Manhattan is a island in the
Hudson River, which flows either side of it. The WTC Complex is quite close to
the waterfront, opposite New Jersey. So close, in fact, that it needs to be
protected by what is known as the Bathtub. This acts like an underground
'levee' or 'dyke', to keep the sub terra parts (7 levels of Sub-Basements) of
the Complex 'dry'.
There is also a system of
underground trains that connect Manhattan with New Jersey. These are known as
PATH Trains (Port Authority Trans-Hudson Trains). Rupturing these would also
flood Manhattan. (They surface inside the Bathtub).
The point is that 9/11 was,
indeed, a Psy-op, but only to bring down the WTC Complex (which was, by the
way, condemned in 1989, because of the asbestos, and the galvanic erosion
problems. It was given 12 more years of existence, and would have cost over $5
million to repair. In 1989 the WTC Complex became a White Elephant. The only
safe method was to dismantle the Towers piece by piece, which would have cost
more than building them in the first place … because now the asbestos would
have had to have been considered).
The 9/11 perps needed to
bring down the complex, but
not to flood Manhattan … New Orleans was the target for the 'flooding' Psy-op.
If the Towers had been
brought down by 'standard' Controlled Demolitions, then (it has been calculated
that) the result would have registered 3.8 on the Richter Scale per Tower
(based on the height and mass, etc. of each Tower). Even one collapse, at this
level, would have decimated the Bathtub, and flooded Manhattan Island.
How, then, to destroy the
buildings (blaming Arabs) without damaging the Bathtub?
The next stage of the
argument moves to Seattle. Where data is available in respect of the Controlled
Demolition of the Seattle Kingdome.
The Kingdome was ONE QUARTER
the mass of each Tower. It was circular, and had a WIDER FOOTPRINT than each
Tower (so the weight was spread over a larger area), and was only about as high
as the 20th Floor of the Towers. The Towers sat on bedrock, whereas the
Kingdome sat on a much softer, less rigid, foundation.
Furthermore the 'Centre of
Mass' of each Tower was roughly 7˝ times higher than that of the Kingdome. The
'Centre of Mass' can be looked as 'the
average height from which the entire mass of the building has been dropped'.
Everyone knows that the higher something is dropped, the harder it hits, when
it reaches the ground.
When the Kingdome was
demolished, it registered 2.3 on the Richter Scale.
When WTC1 'disappeared of
the face of Planet Earth' it registered 2.3 on the Richter Scale.
A few minutes before that,
WTC2 'disappeared', registering 2.1.
These 'collapses' were SMALL
ENOUGH TO ENSURE THAT THE BATHTUB WAS NOT RUPTURED.
How did they manage to
minimise the demise of each Tower such that it registered such small ground
shakes (relatively speaking, of course)? A ground shake equal - in one case -
to that of the Seattle Kingdome … of ONE QUARTER the size & mass?
The answer is 'by dissolving
the top THREE QUARTERS of each building'. Yes - DISSOLVING. Into the fine toxic
dust that anyone who has looked at the pictures, or seen the videos (e.g.
911Eyewitness) can see only too well.
The lower 20 (or so) floors
were more or less equivalent to the Kingdome. They were demolished by
'conventional' means (could even be Steven Jones' 'thermate' … who knows?) in
order to provide sufficient 'debris' … such that no-one would 'notice' that
there was nothing to show for the upper 70+ floors.
It was these lower floors that created the
seismic readings.
So that explains the way the
Towers were brought down, in accordance with the known (and verified) data
measurements.
Now … you explain how to
DISSOLVE (so that it simply blows away on the wind), THREE QUARTERS of a
steel-framed high rise.
Your explanation needs to
take into account the circular holes in the buildings & streets, and the
'toasted' cars … some up to ˝ mile away.
WTC1 & WTC2 were not 'demolished'. They
were 'destroyed' … basically they were 'dissolved'.
Profs. Judy Wood &
Morgan Reynolds have made an attempt to explain this 'destruction' here.
Maybe you can do better?
Feel free to Google
"directed energy weapon", and see how many hits you get.
The top one will probably be
this.
Direct-energy Weapons are
basically high-power Microwaves.
The PAPER? Well, consider what happens to
paper (and card, and plastic) when you put it into a Microwave Oven. The FOOD
warms up (equivalent to 'people'), but the paper, card or plastic container is
unaffected..
Maybe this also explains the
'jumpers'. Were they being cooked …from the inside (just like a Microwave Oven
works)?
The theory is that energy
was directed at the Towers. This was chosen to 'resonate' on a molecular level
with steel, concrete, and all the major materials (there is plenty of evidence
for more than one beam … one for each major material).
Don't bother to ask "How
much energy would that take". The answer is "Are the Towers still
standing?"
Don't bother to ask (as
Prof. Steven Jones does) "Where did the energy come from?" . Steven
Jones knows full well where it comes from. Read up on Nikola Tesla. It is
possible he worked on the very device that was used, during his time at Los
Alamos. YOU CAN REST ASSURED THAT THE *MANHATTAN* PROJECT HAS COME A LONG WAY
SINCE THE 1940s.